1. Heckman JD, Ryaby JP, McCabe J, Frey J, Kilcoyne RF. Acceleration of tibial fracture-healing by non-invasive, low-intensity pulsed ultrasound. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994;76(1):26-34. doi:10.2106/00004623-199401000-00004
  2. Kristiansen TK, Ryaby JP, McCabe J, Frey JJ, Roe LR. Accelerated healing of distal radial fractures with the use of specific, low-intensity ultrasound. A multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79(7):961-73. doi:10.2106/00004623-199707000-00002
  3. Nolte PA, van der Krans A, Patka P, Janssen IM, Ryaby JP, Albers GH. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound in the treatment of nonunions. J Trauma. 2001;51(4):693-703. doi:10.1097/00005373-200110000-00012
  4. Bioventus LLC. Data on File, RPT-001321.
  5. Schofer MD, Block JE, Aigner J, Schmelz A. Improved healing response in delayed unions of the tibia with low-intensity pulsed ultrasound: results of a randomized sham-controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010;11:229. doi:10.1186/1471-2474-11-229
  6. Zura R, Xiong Z, Einhorn T, et al. Epidemiology of fracture nonunion in 18 human bones. JAMA Surg. 2016;151(11):e162775. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2016.2775
  7. Lerner A, Stein H, Soudry M. Compound high-energy limb fractures with delayed union: our experience with adjuvant ultrasound stimulation (exogen). Ultrasonics. 2004;42(1-9):915-7. doi:10.1016/j.ultras.2003.11.014
  8. Hernandez RK, Do TP, Critchlow CW, Dent RE, Jick SS. Patient-related risk factors for fracture-healing complications in the United Kingdom General Practice Research Database. Acta Orthop. 2012;83(6):653-60. doi:10.3109/17453674.2012.747054
  9. Cook SD, Ryaby JP, McCabe J, Frey JJ, Heckman JD, Kristiansen TK. Acceleration of tibia and distal radius fracture healing in patients who smoke. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997;(337):198-207. doi:10.1097/00003086-199704000-00022
  10. Scolaro JA, Schenker ML, Yannascoli S, Baldwin K, Mehta S, Ahn J. Cigarette smoking increases complications following fracture: a systematic review. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96(8):674-81. doi:10.2106/JBJS.M.00081
  11. iData Research. Orthopedic Trauma Devices Market Size, Share & COVID-19 Impact Analysis. United States, 2019-2025. Posted 2019. Accessed July 29, 2021. Subscription-based website.
  12. Bioventus LLC. Data on file, RPT-000965.
  13. Bone growth stimulators. Medical Clinical Policy Bulletin. Last updated May 25, 2021.
  14. Bone growth stimulators: electrical (invasive, noninvasive), ultrasound. Medical Coverage Policy. Last updated May 15, 2021.
  15. Bone growth stimulators. Medical Coverage Policy. Last updated March 25, 2021.
  16. United Healthcare. Electrical and ultrasound bone growth stimulators. UnitedHealthcare® Commercial Medical Policy. Last updated January 1, 2021.
  17. Zura R, Mehta S, Della Rocca GJ, Jones J, Steen RG. A cohort study of 4,190 patients treated with low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS): findings in the elderly versus all patients. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015;16:45. doi:10.1186/s12891-015-0498-1
  18. Salem KH, Schemlz A. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound shortens the treatment time in tibial distraction osteogenesis. Int Orthop. 2014;38(7):1477-82. doi:10.1007/s00264-013-2254-1
  19. Roussignol X, Currey C, Duparc F, Dujardin F. Indications and results for the Exogen™ ultrasound system in the management of non-union: a 59-case pilot study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2012;98(2):206-13. doi:10.1016/ j.otsr.2011.10.011
  20. Dudda M, Hauser J, Muhr G, Esenwein SA. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound as a useful adjuvant during distraction osteogenesis: a prospective, randomized controlled trial. J Trauma. 2011;71(5):1376-80. doi:10.1097/TA.0b013e31821912b2
  21. El-Mowafi H, Mohsen M. The effect of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound on callus maturation in tibial distraction osteogenesis. Int Orthop. 2005;29(2):121-4. doi:10.1007/s00264-004-0625-3
  22. Gold SM, Wasserman R. Preliminary results of tibial bone transports with pulsed low intensity ultrasound (Exogen). J Orthop Trauma. 2005;19(1):10-6. doi:10.1097/00005131-200501000-00003
  23. Mayr E. Rudzki MM, Rudzki M, Borchardt B, Häusser H, Rüter A. Does low intensity, pulsed ultrasound speed healing of scaphoid fractures? Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2000;32(2):115-22. doi:10.1055/s-2000-19253
  24. Nolte P, Anderson R, Strauss E, et al. Heal rate of metatarsal fractures: a propensity matching study of patients treated with low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) vs. surgical and other treatments. Injury. 2016;47(11):2584-90. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2016.09.023
  25. Leung KS, Lee WS, Tsui HF, Liu PP, Cheung WH. Complex tibial fracture outcomes following treatment with low-intensity pulsed ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2004;30(3):389-95. doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2003.11.008
  26. Tsumaki N, Kakiuchi M, Sasaki J, Ochi T, Yoshikawa H. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound accelerates maturation of callus in patients treated with opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy by hemicallotasis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86(11):2399-405. doi:10.2106/00004623-200411000-00006
  27. Song MH, Kim T-J, Kang SH, Song H-R. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound enhances callus consolidation in distraction osteogenesis of the tibia by the technique of lengthening over the nail procedure. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019;20(1):108. doi:10.1186/s12891-019-2490-7
  28. Coughlin MJ, Smith BW, Traughber P. The evaluation of the healing rate of subtalar arthrodeses, part 2: the effect of low-intensity ultrasound stimulation. Foot Ankle Int. 2008;29(10):970-7. doi:10.3113/FAI.2008.097
  29. Gebauer D, Mayr E, Orthner E, Ryaby JP. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound: effects on nonunions. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2005;31(10):1391-402. doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2005.06.002
  30. Kinami Y, Noda T, Ozaki T. Efficacy of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound treatment for surgically managed fresh diaphyseal fractures of the lower extremity: multi-center retrospective cohort study. J Orthop Sci. 2013;18(3):410-8. doi:10.1007/s00776-013-0358-5
  31. Jingushi S, Mizuno K, Matsushita T, Itoman M. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound treatment for postoperative delayed union or nonunion of long bone fractures. J Orthop Sci. 2007;12(1):35-41. doi:10.1007/s00776-006-1080-3
  32. Pigozzi F, Moneta MR, Giombini A, et al. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound in the conservative treatment of pseudoarthrosis. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2004;44(2):173-8.
  33. Rutten S, Nolte PA, Guit GL, Bouman DE, Albers GH. Use of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound for posttraumatic nonunions of the tibia: a review of patients treated in the Netherlands. J Trauma. 2007;62(4):902-8. doi:10.1097/01.ta.0000238663.33796.fb
  34. Watanabe Y, Arai Y, Takenaka N, Kobayashi M, Matsushita T. Three key factors affecting treatment results of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound for delayed unions and nonunions: instability, gap size, and atrophic nonunion. J Orthop Sci. 2013;18(5):803-10. doi:10.1007/s00776-013-0415-0
  35. Zura R, Della Rocca GJ, Mehta S, et al. Treatment of chronic (>1 year) fracture nonunion: heal rate in a cohort of 767 patients treated with low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS). Injury. 2015;46(10):2036-41. doi:10.1016/ j.injury.2015.05.042
  36. Greenleaf JF, Kinnick RR, Bronk JT, Bolander ME, Ultrasound induced tissue motion during fracture treatment? Ultrasound Med Biol. 2003;29(suppl 5):S157-8. doi:10.1016/S0301-5629(03)00634-3
  37. Tang CH, Yang RS, Huang TH, et al. Ultrasound stimulates cyclooxygenase-2 expression and increases bone formation through integrin, focal adhesion kinase, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, and Akt pathway in osteoblasts, Pharmacol. 2006;69(6):2047-57. doi:10.1124/mol.105.022160
  38. Naruse K, Sekiya H, Harada Y, et al. Prolonged endochondral bone healing in senescence is shortened by low-intensity pulsed ultrasound in a manner dependent on COX-2. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2010;36(7):1098-108. doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2010.04.011
  39. Azuma Y, Ito M, Harada Y, Takagi H, Ohta T, Jingushi S. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound accelerates rat femoral fracture healing by acting on the various cellular reactions in the fracture callus. J Bone Miner Res. 2001;16(4):671-80.
  40. Silva JC. What to know about bone fracture repair. Last updated July 11, 2018.
  41. Romanò C, Messina J, Meani E. Low-intensity ultrasound for the treatment of septic pseudarthrosis. Quaderni di Infezioni Osteoarticolari. 1999;(supple 561):83-93.
  42. Wedro B. Broken fracture (broken bone). Last updated February 11, 2020.
  43. General information about pain after a fracture. Accessed July 30, 2021.
  44. Brazier Y. What is a fracture? Posted August 24, 2021.
  45. NYU Langone Health. Diagnosing nonhealing fractures. Accessed July 30, 2021.
  46. Access Ortho. How long do fractures take to heal? How long will I be in a cast/brace? Posted March 19, 2020.
  47. Silva JC. What to know about bone fracture repair. Last updated July 11, 2018.
  48. Cluett J. How bone growth stimulators work. Last updated March 29, 2020.
  49. Cook JJ, Summers NJ, Cook EA. Healing in the new millennium: bone stimulators: an overview of where we’ve been and where we may be heading. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2015;32(1)45-59. doi:10.1016/j.cpm.2014.09.003
  50. Lai CH, Chen SC, Chiu LH, et al. Effects of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound, dexamethasone/TGF-ß1 and/or BMP-2 on the transcriptional expression of genes in human mesenchymal stem cells: chondrogenic vs. osteogenic differentiation. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2010;36(6):1022-33. doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2010.03.014
  51. Sant’Anna EF, Leven RM, Virdi AS, Sumner DR. Effect of low intensity pulsed ultrasound and BMP-2 on rat bone marrow stromal cell gene expression. J Orthop Res. 2005;23(3):646-52. doi:10.1016/j.orthres.2004.09.007
  52. Heckman JD, Sarasohn-Kahn. The economics of treating tibia fractures. The cost of delayed unions. Bull Hosp Jt Dis. 1997:56(1):63-72.
  53. Leighton R, Watson JT, Giannoudis P, Papakostidis C, Harrison A, Steen RG. Healing of fracture nonunions treated with low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Injury. 2017;48(7):1339-47. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2017.05.016
  54. Bioventus LLC. Humerus nonunion claims based on EXOGEN Registry. Data on file, RPT-000396.
  55. Bioventus LLC. Clavicle nonunion claims based on EXOGEN Registry. Data on file, RPT-000409.
  56. Bioventus LLC. Scaphoid nonunion claims based on EXOGEN Registry. Data on file, RPT-000398.
  57. Bioventus LLC. Radius/ulna nonunion claims based on EXOGEN Registry. Data on file, RPT-000410.
  58. Bioventus LLC. Femur nonunion claims based on EXOGEN Registry. Data on file, RPT-000395.
  59. Bioventus LLC. Hand/wrist nonunion claims based on EXOGEN Registry. Data on file, RPT-000411.
  60. Bioventus LLC. Ankle nonunion claims based on EXOGEN Registry. Data on file, RPT-000408.
  61. Bioventus LLC. Tibia nonunion claims based on EXOGEN Registry. Data on file, RPT-000391.
  62. Bioventus LLC. Metatarsal nonunion claims based on EXOGEN Registry. Data on file, RPT-000389.
  63. Bioventus LLC. Foot nonunion claims based on EXOGEN Registry. Data on file, RPT-000412.
  64. Leung KS, Cheung WH, Zhang C, Lee KM, Lo HK. Low intensity pulsed ultrasound stimulates osteogenic activity of human periosteal cells. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;(418):253-9. doi:10.1097/00003086-200401000-00044
  65. Bioventus LLC. Data on file, RPT-000368.
  66. Harrison A, Alt V. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) for stimulation of bone healing – A narrative review. Injury. 2001;52(suppl 2):S91-6. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2021.05.002
  67. Coords M, Breitbart E, Paglia D, et al. The effects of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound upon diabetic fracture healing. J Orthop Res. 2011;29(2):181-8.
  68. Bioventus LLC. EXOGEN® User Guide. Last Updated 2023.

Summary of Indications for Use
The EXOGEN Ultrasound Bone Healing System is indicated for the non-invasive treatment of established nonunions* excluding skull and vertebra. The EXOGEN device has also been reported as effective as an adjunctive non-invasive treatment of established nonunions in patients:

  • With internal or external fracture fixation hardware present. EXOGEN cannot penetrate metal and therefore should not be applied directly over hardware.
  • Undergoing treatment for infection at the fracture site. EXOGEN is not intended to treat the infection.
  • Believed to have diminished bone quality. EXOGEN is not intended to treat diminished bone quality.

In addition, EXOGEN is indicated for accelerating the time to a healed fracture for fresh, closed, posteriorly displaced distal radius fractures and fresh, closed or Grade I open tibial diaphysis fractures in skeletally mature individuals when these fractures are orthopedically managed by closed reduction and cast immobilization.

There are no known contraindications for the EXOGEN device. Safety and effectiveness have not been established for individuals lacking skeletal maturity, pregnant or nursing women, patients with cardiac pacemakers, on fractures due to bone cancer, or on patients with poor blood circulation or clotting problems. Some patients may be sensitive to the ultrasound gel.

*A nonunion is considered to be established when the fracture site shows no visibly progressive signs of healing.

Full prescribing information can be found in product labelling, at, or by calling Customer Service at 1-800-836-4080.